Wednesday, November 13, 2024

How to Merge Branches with Different Histories in Git: A Step-by-Step Guide

 



Merging branches in Git is typically straightforward when they share a common ancestor. But what happens when you want to merge two branches that have entirely different histories? This situation can arise when combining code from independent projects, migrating changes from a downstream repository, or simply bringing together two repositories that began separately. In this article, we’ll go over how to merge branches with no shared history, creating a pull request in GitHub as the final step.

Let’s walk through this step-by-step using a real-world scenario: merging a branch from a downstream repository into the main branch of an origin repository.

Why This Method?

When two branches have no shared history, Git doesn’t automatically know how to combine them. Merging requires an "unrelated histories" approach, allowing you to integrate them while keeping both histories intact. This method ensures that all commits from the separate branch will be included in the final merge, but it will result in a single merge commit to tie them together.

Step 1: Set Up Your Repository and Check Out the main Branch

Start by ensuring you have a local copy of the main branch from the origin repository. Fetch the latest changes to make sure you’re working with the current version of main:


git fetch origin git checkout origin/main

Now create a new branch off main to use as a temporary merge branch:


git checkout -b main-with-downstream

This main-with-downstream branch will handle the merge and any conflicts that may arise, leaving your original branches untouched.

Step 2: Merge the from-downstream Branch Using the --allow-unrelated-histories Flag

With main-with-downstream checked out, you’re ready to merge the changes from the from-downstream branch. Because the branches have different histories, you need to use the --allow-unrelated-histories flag to bypass Git’s assumption that branches should share a common ancestry.

Fetch the from-downstream branch to ensure it’s up to date:


git fetch downstream

Then, initiate the merge:


git merge --allow-unrelated-histories downstream/from-downstream

This command tells Git to merge the two branches despite the lack of shared history.

Step 3: Resolve Any Merge Conflicts

When merging unrelated histories, conflicts are common, as files with similar names or structures may exist in both branches but with different content. Git will stop at each conflict, allowing you to manually decide how to resolve it.

To view all files with conflicts, use:


git status

Open each file listed as "unmerged" and decide which version to keep or how to combine changes. After editing each file, mark it as resolved:


git add <file_name>

Once you’ve resolved all conflicts, complete the merge:


git commit -m "Merge from-downstream into main-with-downstream with unrelated histories"

Step 4: Push the Merged Branch to origin

With all conflicts resolved and the merge complete, it’s time to push main-with-downstream to the origin remote.


git push origin main-with-downstream

This step publishes the new branch with its merge commit, making it available for review and a pull request.

Step 5: Create a Pull Request on GitHub

Head over to your GitHub repository and navigate to the Pull Requests tab. Select New Pull Request and choose main-with-downstream as the source branch and main as the target branch.

Fill in the title and description with a summary of the changes, mentioning that you’ve merged unrelated histories. GitHub will display the diff for the pull request, which should include all commits from both branches along with the single merge commit.

Once ready, click Create Pull Request. This pull request is now ready for review or direct merging into the main branch.

Why Use a Merge Commit?

Creating a single merge commit in the main-with-downstream branch has a few advantages:

  • Preservation of History: Both commit histories remain intact, allowing for complete traceability of the code from both branches.
  • Conflict Resolution: Handling conflicts in a separate merge branch ensures that main stays unaffected until the merge is ready to be completed.
  • Future Merging: The new branch structure ensures that any future merges between these branches won’t require the --allow-unrelated-histories flag, as Git will recognize them as part of the same repository.

Conclusion

Merging branches with different histories in Git may sound daunting, but it’s manageable by creating a new branch, merging with the --allow-unrelated-histories flag, and resolving conflicts. By pushing the merge commit to origin and creating a pull request, you can seamlessly integrate changes from one branch into another, even if they started in completely different repositories. This approach maintains transparency and provides a clean history of both branches, preserving all work and enabling future collaboration.